![]() |
| |||||||
CFIT / VeriSign: And now ?dans le forum Cedric Manara de Blogs; So the Coalition For Internet Transparency may proceed in its antitrust lawsuit against VeriSign. Since there can only be one ... |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Outils de la discussion | Modes d'affichage |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Administrator Date d'inscription: mars 2008
Messages: 847
| So the Coalition For Internet Transparency may proceed in its antitrust lawsuit against VeriSign. Since there can only be one operator for each domain name registry at any one time, the only viable competition can take place in connection with obtaining a new contract after expiration of the old one. A US Court thus ruled that a no-bid contract for VeriSign is anticompetitive per se. I wonder whether the ruling would have been the same in the case of a sponsored gTLD (they are of a different nature) - and of course the outcome would be different with some of the new gTLDs to be launched (think .sport, a project said to be brought by two different applicants).- Prof. Cedric Manara [Content under License] Pour en lire plus... |
| | |
| Domaineur.com: Liens Sponsorisés |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| cfit, verisign |
| Outils de la discussion | |
| Modes d'affichage | |
| |
| ||||
| Discussion | Auteur | Forum | Réponses | Dernier message |
| Blog Stéphane Van Gelder: Le monopole Verisign sur le .COM en danger ? | TechAdmin | Stéphane Van Gelder - Indom | 0 | 12/07/2010 16h14 |
| [Gandi:] Gandi répercute en partie la 3ème augmentation de prix de Verisign au 1er Juillet | Francois | Le bar de Gandi | 2 | 01/06/2010 00h21 |